Kitab-i-Badi/English316: Difference between revisions

From Baha'i Writings Collaborative Translation Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Pywikibot 8.1.0.dev0)
 
m (Pywikibot 8.1.0.dev0)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
After the spirit appeared and the word of God appeared from behind the veils of the veil to the illuminations of the Horoscope, the East, and the Moon [160], people protested that according to appearance, the Holy Prophet was consorting with sinners. As it is recorded in the written Bible that he was associating with the Asharins, as they protested against that Sultan of Ahadiya in many places. Especially on one of the days of some of the heedless among the Yadiyeh, he protested: "O Spirit of God! The companions of Yahya bin Zacharia were very ascetic and devout, to the extent that they fast during the days of fasting and nights in remembrance of God. But what I saw from you and your companions It is possible that you are not engaged in worship and remembrance, but you are not avoiding people's wealth. So the soul thought about itself, then raised its head and said: "If Yahya had been our Ali, you would say why did you kill him, O Mullah of the polytheists?" He says, according to you, I am a sinner, Yahya bin Zachariah, who has not committed any sin and all are bound by the beauty of asceticism and piety, so why did you kill him? Fabhat al-Zhi is disbelief, and it is lost.
And in the abrogation of previous rulings, a point of statement - the spirit of what is other than him, may he be sacrificed - may the foundation of each whose will is entrusted with the same manifestation of the Asth, more than the evidence of commands and prohibitions before the signature of the firm and other evidence of the abrogation of the force. In His hands is the matter, and no one has the right to object to Him or say “why” and “with what” in everything He does and commands. And whoever says “why” and “with what” has disbelieved in God, fought against himself, argued with his authority, denied his command, and was of the polytheists.

Latest revision as of 04:50, 15 May 2023

And in the abrogation of previous rulings, a point of statement - the spirit of what is other than him, may he be sacrificed - may the foundation of each whose will is entrusted with the same manifestation of the Asth, more than the evidence of commands and prohibitions before the signature of the firm and other evidence of the abrogation of the force. In His hands is the matter, and no one has the right to object to Him or say “why” and “with what” in everything He does and commands. And whoever says “why” and “with what” has disbelieved in God, fought against himself, argued with his authority, denied his command, and was of the polytheists.