Kitab-i-Badi/GPT4 320: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Trident765 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "And changing the laws has no relevance to the claim of superiority over the previous appearance. The laws must be changed and abrogate the previous commands, as the Point of Expression itself has said that if there were no objections from the people of the Criterion, I would not abrogate the law of the Criterion. Furthermore, according to your belief and that of all the respected ones, David is one of the greatest prophets and the possessor of the Book. Nevertheless, he...") |
TridentBot (talk | contribs) m (Pywikibot 8.1.0.dev0) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It was not a position of authority in religious jurisprudence but a position beyond these invocations and words, and he himself was a renewer of the religious laws. He also realized that he was one of the jurists and had mentioned this jurisprudential issue contrary to the scholars and considered it permissible. |
Latest revision as of 20:24, 14 May 2023
It was not a position of authority in religious jurisprudence but a position beyond these invocations and words, and he himself was a renewer of the religious laws. He also realized that he was one of the jurists and had mentioned this jurisprudential issue contrary to the scholars and considered it permissible.