Kitab-i-Badi/English535: Difference between revisions

From Baha'i Writings Collaborative Translation Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Pywikibot 8.1.0.dev0)
m (Pywikibot 8.1.0.dev0)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
And from these past levels, some words are false. As he wrote in this position: the certainty of whoever has this position is true and his words are true and his other is false, and then he wrote that: if he believes in this matter as well, then there is no proof of the promised soul and he will be one of the saints of Bayan period. And that too after the approval of Mirza Yahya. Be fair to yourself! If certainty is true, how else will it depend on the confirmation of knowledge? Now it is not outside of these two: either you have to admit the first word that was canceled and mentioned the unconscious mind, or the second statement. And Allah, the sign of anger has appeared and is evident in the likes of those souls, even though you are not a poet, what do you write and what do you mention.
Kuleh - big lies and falsehood -: be fair: a person who has been cultivated for twenty [287] years in this period, twenty years also in the period of mystics, writes four words, even a thousand words, of the contents of mysticism and the form of verses, what does it have to do with nature? The difference between these two is what was said. And if they wrote in the same way, and the situation is difficult, then it is not a proof for that promised person and it is not a proof for the denial and blasphemy of Mirza Yahya, but they are one of the pioneers of Bayan period. That too on the condition of confirming the fruit, not denying and oppressing him.

Latest revision as of 15:38, 16 May 2023

Kuleh - big lies and falsehood -: be fair: a person who has been cultivated for twenty [287] years in this period, twenty years also in the period of mystics, writes four words, even a thousand words, of the contents of mysticism and the form of verses, what does it have to do with nature? The difference between these two is what was said. And if they wrote in the same way, and the situation is difficult, then it is not a proof for that promised person and it is not a proof for the denial and blasphemy of Mirza Yahya, but they are one of the pioneers of Bayan period. That too on the condition of confirming the fruit, not denying and oppressing him.