Kitab-i-Badi/English535: Difference between revisions

From Baha'i Writings Collaborative Translation Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Pywikibot 8.1.0.dev0)
m (Pywikibot 8.1.0.dev0)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
These words of the courts are revealed in response to your question, but they have said that it is certain that they will be excused with another excuse, which is that the word Haqq does not increase the polytheists except for harm. I don't know what excuse you will stick to and to what extent. And Allah, O slave, is very far from the side of justice and very far from the place of nearness. I don't know what made you think about it, even though he did not appear before and did not benefit from the service of the appearance before, and before the experience, according to your own words, you engaged in these blasphemous words, and you have denied those who are aware of his command, and you are selfish. Ra, who was like you and never knew anything, confirmed him.
Kuleh - big lies and falsehood -: be fair: a person who has been cultivated for twenty [287] years in this period, twenty years also in the period of mystics, writes four words, even a thousand words, of the contents of mysticism and the form of verses, what does it have to do with nature? The difference between these two is what was said. And if they wrote in the same way, and the situation is difficult, then it is not a proof for that promised person and it is not a proof for the denial and blasphemy of Mirza Yahya, but they are one of the pioneers of Bayan period. That too on the condition of confirming the fruit, not denying and oppressing him.

Latest revision as of 15:38, 16 May 2023

Kuleh - big lies and falsehood -: be fair: a person who has been cultivated for twenty [287] years in this period, twenty years also in the period of mystics, writes four words, even a thousand words, of the contents of mysticism and the form of verses, what does it have to do with nature? The difference between these two is what was said. And if they wrote in the same way, and the situation is difficult, then it is not a proof for that promised person and it is not a proof for the denial and blasphemy of Mirza Yahya, but they are one of the pioneers of Bayan period. That too on the condition of confirming the fruit, not denying and oppressing him.